About 30 people have been living at 104 Darling Street for more than two decades
Matthew Hirsch/GroundUp
Unathi Mangali’s daughter was a baby when they moved into 104 Darling Street in the Cape Town city centre twenty years ago. Today her daughter is 22 years old. They are among about 30 people facing eviction from the property.
The three-storey building is owned by the National Department of Public Works and Infrastructure. It is one of 24 state-owned buildings across the country being released by the department. Eviction notices were issued to residents in February.
When Mangali and her family moved into the building, a shop was still operating from the ground floor, where her mother worked as a cleaner and a cook.
Residents used to rent their rooms from the previous tenant of the building, who was evicted, but the people living in the building were not included in the eviction order. The building was abandoned by the department. In the years since, more people have moved in.
“In 2016, the electricity was cut off. Since then we have been in the building without electricity. Things started getting worse,” Mangali told GroundUp. She said some people left after a fire on the top floor of the building in 2017.
GroundUp visited the site last week. The burned roof of the top floor has been fixed. Several rooms have been boarded up to keep rats out. Windows are broken. Someone has erected a corrugated-iron shack in the hall.
Outside the building, in what used to be the parking lot, there are about 15 informal structures.
Mangali said she was frustrated by the eviction notice. “The unemployment rate is so high. I was retrenched. It’s easier to get a job now because I’m in the city.”
Safety Concerns
One of the main reasons the department wants to evict the residents is that the building has been declared unsafe. A site inspection was conducted in July 2024 and the site was officially named a problem building by the City of Cape Town last year.
In court papers, the department said it would seek an urgent eviction application on 9 April. The department contends that trees surrounding the building pose a fire hazard and that the “dilapidated building could collapse”. The department owes R100,000 to the municipality for rates and taxes on the building.
“The building has no running water, no electricity, no proper ventilation and no ablution facilities. These living conditions are a health hazard, making the occupants and the children prone to illness,” the court papers read.
Lennox Mabaso, Department of Public Works and Infrastructure spokesperson, said the building will likely be demolished. “It is evident to anyone that the current state of the property is not fit for human occupation,” he told GroundUp.
During a site visit in September, officials from the City and the department did not go inside the building, citing safety concerns. Mangali said she saw them from her balcony.
She says it is still safer in the building than elsewhere. “We just want to be inside. We are not prepared to go anywhere. This is our home. We managed to fix the roof.”
But she added that the building often acts as a hiding place for criminals. Mangali says there is no access control, so anyone can enter the building.
Grace Shauli, who moved into the building during the Covid lockdown, says it was a tough time. “There was a problem with water and the toilets. These skollies steal stuff and get inside. We have been fighting them for a long time.”
“Even though there have been a lot of problems, we manage. If they chase me out it would be a problem to get another place to stay.”
Shauli previously worked at a coffee shop in town which has gone out of business.
State building resolutions
After a visit to 104 Darling Street in September, Cape Town Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis said in a statement that a new joint technical committee would help fast-track resolutions to problem buildings owned by the state.
“There are several rundown state-owned buildings in Cape Town that are a source of crime, and a blight on neighbourhoods … Some of these buildings and land parcels could be released for affordable housing, while others should simply be demolished or sold so that they can be put to more productive use,” he said.